Independent curiosity. Traceable sources.FOUNDING EDITION   /   12 OCTOBER 2026Our evidence standard
Witness / Evidence profile

Chief Alexandro Wiggins

U.S. Navy senior chief petty officer; USS Jackson eyewitness

An operations specialist who described a February 2023 encounter from aboard USS Jackson.

By UFO Aliens News Research DeskPublished Sources checked
Public claim or contribution

Reported four luminous objects, including one apparently rising from the water, followed by a synchronized departure.

Basis of knowledge

Personal visual observations and checks of shipboard displays; his account does not identify an operator, manufacturer or extraterrestrial origin.

Background and documented career

In his 2025 written testimony, Wiggins identified himself as an active-duty Navy senior chief operations specialist with approximately 23 years of service. He described duties involving sensor tracks, the air and surface picture, and navigation safety. [1]

The House Oversight task force listed him as a UAP witness for its September 9, 2025 hearing. That designation records the capacity in which he appeared; the committee's invitation itself does not validate the physical interpretation of his sighting. [2]

What has been claimed or reported

Wiggins dated the encounter to February 15, 2023, off Southern California. He said he moved between the combat information center and bridge wing, saw a light rise from the waterline, and observed four objects depart together. He subsequently checked a radar picture that no longer showed them. [1]

What the public record supports

Weaponized published footage attributed to USS Jackson, source-frame screenshots with time and location readouts, and crew dialogue in April 2025. Its report describes two objects tracked in the obtained infrared footage. These materials provide a public record to examine alongside the witness account, rather than an independently measured reconstruction of every reported movement. [3]

Limits, disputes and open questions

His written statement expressly calls the apparent near-instantaneous acceleration subjective and identifies the testimony as personal, not an official Navy conclusion. A sightline near the waterline is an observation; interpreting it as an object physically crossing the sea surface requires additional evidence. [1]

The publishers disclose that the video was stabilized and some screenshots sharpened. The release supplies selected imagery and witness descriptions, not a complete radar dataset or calibrated speed analysis. Their report leaves the objects' origin, destination, operator and purpose unknown. [3]

Timeline of the account and record

  1. 2023-02-15

    Reported USS Jackson encounter. [1]

  2. 2025-04-08

    Weaponized publishes the attributed shipboard footage and metadata. [3]

  3. 2025-09-09

    Appears as a UAP witness at the House task force hearing. [2]

Official hearing record

Read the statement and full proceedings alongside the profile.

Sources and what they establish

  1. Statement of Alexandro C. Wiggins ↗U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform · 2025-09-09

    Primary witness statement: self-described service background, duties, encounter chronology, sensor observations and express limitations. It is personal testimony, not Navy validation.

  2. Restoring Public Trust Through UAP Transparency and Whistleblower Protection ↗U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform · 2025-09-09

    Official hearing date, witness list and identification of Wiggins as a UAP witness.

  3. The USS Jackson Tic Tac UAP / Imaged Off the Coast of Southern California ↗Weaponized · 2025-04-08

    Original footage release, source-frame metadata, processing disclosure and the publishers' account of the event; not an independent government determination.

How to read this profile

A documented career, a personal observation, an attributed allegation and corroboration are assessed separately. Source publication does not make every statement within it independently verified. This profile is original, AI-assisted research and has not received independent expert review. Our assessment method · Corrections policy.